Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld8 July 20263353225

212 Kingsley Road, HOUNSLOW, TW3 4AR

the unauthorised erection of rear extensions

Authority
London Borough of Hounslow
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Naylor R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the enforcement notice was properly served
  • Whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control
  • Whether the requirements of the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach
  • Whether the period for compliance is reasonable

What decided it

The property is subdivided into two flats and therefore does not benefit from permitted development rights under Part 1 of the GPDO, and the extensions exceed the permitted development thresholds, making planning permission necessary.

Judgments cited: Newham LBC v Miah [2016] EWHC 1043 (Admin); Oldham MBC v Tanna [2017] 1 WLR 1970

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.