Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20253353317

301 Hempstead Road, WATFORD, WD17 3NL

demolition of the existing detached house and erection of a pair of 4- bedroom semi-detached houses

Authority
Watford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bennett T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework, including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future residents with specific regard to internal floorspace
  • Whether the proposal would provide an acceptable level of parking having regard to promoting the use of sustainable transport modes
  • Whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for biodiversity net gain
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal failed to meet the Nationally Described Technical Space Standards for internal floorspace, would exceed maximum car parking provision contrary to local policy, and could not adequately secure biodiversity net gain as required by statute, with these conflicts with the development plan not outweighed by material considerations.

Framework references: 153, 154, 115

Plan policies cited: Policy SS1.1, Policy HO3.10, Policy QD6.4, Policy ST11.5, Policy NE9.8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.