Planning appeal decision
Thorley Wash Grange, Thorley Street, Thorley, Bishops Stortford, CM23 4AT
Planning appeal 3353429 at Thorley Wash Grange, Thorley Street, Thorley, Bishops Stortford, CM23 4AT (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 28 October 2025 by Inspector Cullen F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to paragraph 154 g) of the Framework and relevant development plan policies.
construction of four detached residential premises on land to the east of Thorley Wash Grange, Spellbrook
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cullen F
- Postcode
- CM23 4AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to paragraph 154 g) of the Framework and relevant development plan policies
- Whether the appeal site is grey belt land and the proposal should not be regarded as inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with particular reference to whether the nearby Grade II listed building, Thorley Wash Grange, provides a strong reason for refusing or restricting development
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area
- The effect of the proposal on trees within the site
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building Thorley Wash Grange through damage to its setting, combined with substantial harm to Green Belt openness and harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate public benefits of housing delivery, such that very special circumstances did not exist.
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm and the considerable weight given to heritage harm, together with harm to character and appearance and uncertainty regarding tree impacts, were not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight of housing delivery benefits and other considerations, resulting in dismissal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GBR1Policy HA1Policy HA7Policy HOU2Policy DES3Policy DES4Policy NE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 125Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 219
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council (Appellant) [2020] UKSC
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed28 October 20266008487The Ranch House, Amwell Hill, Great Amwell, Ware, SG12 9QZ
- Allowed14 October 2026601275023 Bishops Road, Tewin Wood, Tewin, AL6 0NP
- Dismissed28 September 20266006224Land Near Fanshawes Ware Park, Ware, SG12 0DX
- Dismissed25 September 20266006716Little Orchard, London Road, Spellbrook, Hertfordshire, CM23 4BA
- Notice upheld3 July 20263342403Brookfield Farm Barns, West End Road, Wormley West End, Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, EN10 7QN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®