Planning appeal decision
Land to Rear of Abbeyspring, Down Park Drive, Tavistock, Devon, PL19 9AH
Planning appeal 3353465 at Land to Rear of Abbeyspring, Down Park Drive, Tavistock, Devon, PL19 9AH (West Devon Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 June 2025 by Inspector Kent R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposals on the living conditions of the occupiers of the adjoining dwellings in Deer Leap with regard to privacy.
Construction of two new dwellings
- Authority
- West Devon Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Kent R
- Postcode
- PL19 9AH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposals on the living conditions of the occupiers of the adjoining dwellings in Deer Leap with regard to privacy
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for the occupiers of the proposed dwellings with regard to privacy, sunlight and daylight
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the site and its surroundings, including the effect on trees
- the effect of the development on the Tamar Estuaries Complex Special Protection Area (SPA) and the Plymouth Sound & Estuaries Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
What decided it
The failure to secure a planning obligation to mitigate recreational impacts on the protected European sites, combined with the unacceptable privacy harm to neighbouring and future occupiers and moderate harm to character and appearance from tree loss, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
The moderate benefits of two additional energy-efficient dwellings and short-term economic benefits were outweighed by moderate harm to neighbouring privacy, moderate harm to future occupiers' privacy, moderate harm to character and appearance from tree loss, and the inability to mitigate likely significant effects on the SPA and SAC; the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply due to the habitats sites issue.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DEV1Policy DEV20Policy DEV28Policy DEV26Policy SPT12Policy SPT14Policy DEL1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Devon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed27 October 20266012878Development Site at Sx 447 766, Lamerton, PL19 8RX
- Allowed23 September 20266014952Higher Collybeer Farm, Spreyton, EX17 5BA
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263355120Greenslade, Greenslade Lane, Sampford Courtenay, EX20 2SF
- Allowed9 September 20266002006Uphill (Uphill Farm Events), Yelverton, Plymouth, PL20 6DF
- Dismissed10 August 20266004459Land at Sx 448 762 (Land to South of Fortesque Terrace), Lamerton, PL19 8RX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®