Planning appeal decision
Land West of Highfield, Church Lane, Keyingham, Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, HU12 9SX
Planning appeal 3353602 at Land West of Highfield, Church Lane, Keyingham, Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, HU12 9SX (East Riding of Yorkshire Council) was dismissed on 2 January 2025 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would accord with local policies with regard to location.
Outline - Erection of 16 First Home dwellings including associated infrastructure (Access, Layout and Scale to be considered)
- Authority
- East Riding of Yorkshire Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Edginton A
- Postcode
- HU12 9SX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would accord with local policies with regard to location
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of future occupiers
- The effect of the development on highway safety
- The effect of the development on biodiversity and protected species, and protected European sites
- Whether the development would preserve the setting of the Grade I listed St Nicholas church
What decided it
The absence of mitigation for harm to biodiversity and protected species, combined with the failure to secure First Homes delivery and the cumulative harm to character and appearance, highway safety and heritage setting, outweighed the presumption in favour of sustainable development arising from the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing supply.
The presumption in favour of sustainable development arising from insufficient housing supply was outweighed by the strong reasons for refusal provided by harm to designated heritage assets and international habitat sites, combined with unmitigated harm to biodiversity, character and appearance, and highway safety, and the failure to secure the affordable housing benefits that would justify the exception site policy.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S3Policy S4Policy H2Policy ENV1Policy ENV2Policy ENV3Policy ENV4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 12Paragraph 115Paragraph 135Paragraph 16Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Riding of Yorkshire Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed4 August 2026600714151 Hailgate, Howden, DN14 7ST
- Allowed11 June 20266005566Land to the East of The Light Dragoon, 34, Main Street, Etton, HU17 7PQ
- Dismissed2 March 20263376372St. Nicholas Cp School, Holme Church Lane, Beverley, HU17 0QP
- Dismissed26 November 20253370739The Old Chapel, Church Street, Anlaby, East Riding of Yorkshire, HU10 7DG
- Dismissed10 November 20253373338Jinsong, 2 Station Row, Camerton, HU12 9JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®