Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 January 20253353613

196 Sneinton Dale, Nottingham, NG2 4HJ

Planning appeal 3353613 at 196 Sneinton Dale, Nottingham, NG2 4HJ (Nottingham City Council) was dismissed on 13 January 2025 by Inspector Bennett T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and area.

Change of use from Use Class E to restaurant and takeaway (mixed use Class E and sui generis). Installation of flue

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Bennett T
Postcode
NG2 4HJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and area
  • the effect of the change of use on the living conditions of nearby residents, with particular regard to noise, disturbance and anti-social behaviour

What decided it

The proposed flue would be a substantial, bulky and alien feature causing significant adverse visual harm to the character and appearance of the host property and area, conflicting with development plan policies requiring positive contribution to the public realm and respect for local context.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 10 of the Greater Nottingham Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local Plan (2014)Policy DE1 of the Nottingham City Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document Local Plan Part 2 (2020)Policy DE2 of the Nottingham City Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document Local Plan Part 2 (2020)Policy LS1 of the Nottingham City Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document Local Plan Part 2 (2020)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

104 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Nottingham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012324
    291 Wigman Road, Nottingham, NG8 4AJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266012812
    27 Western Boulevard, Nottingham, NG8 1PE
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266011302
    14-16 Hendon Rise, Nottingham, NG3 3AN
  4. Dismissed17 September 20266010946
    38 Highfield Road, Nottingham, NG7 2JE
  5. Dismissed15 June 20266004681
    79-81 Flat Above, Haydn Road, Nottingham, NG5 2LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.