Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 July 20253353738

Pilgrims Corner, Gravelly Hill, Caterham, Surrey, CR36ES

Planning appeal 3353738 at Pilgrims Corner, Gravelly Hill, Caterham, Surrey, CR36ES (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 14 July 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework.

the resubmission of previously refused application for a 4 bedroom detached residential property within 12 months of the original refusal

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Goldberg V
Postcode
CR3 6ES

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on the Surrey Hills National Landscape
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing significant harm to openness and the Surrey Hills National Landscape, and the limited benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm to amount to very special circumstances, and the Green Belt protection in paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework displaces the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt and great weight harm to the Surrey Hills National Landscape were not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of an additional dwelling and renewable energy, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development was displaced by the Green Belt and National Landscape protections in paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy CSP20
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

56 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
  4. Dismissed23 September 20266008688
    Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
  5. Dismissed22 September 20266011736
    Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.