Planning appeal decision
246 Swallow Street, Iver, SL0 0HT
Planning appeal 3353820 at 246 Swallow Street, Iver, SL0 0HT (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was dismissed on 31 March 2025 by Inspector Savage M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal scheme would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2024)(the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
without planning permission, the carrying out of operational development comprising the following: a) the erection of three buildings; b) the erection of a fence; c) the creation of hard surfaced areas; and d) the siting of secure storage containers
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- other · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Savage M
- Postcode
- SL0 0HT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal scheme would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2024)(the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
- If the appeal scheme is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, the effect of it on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the appeal scheme on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the development on protected species
- Whether the development would deliver biodiversity net gain
- If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the appeal scheme
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the buildings and works were substantially completed before the relevant immunity date, and the identified Green Belt, character and biodiversity harms were not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
The modest harm to Green Belt openness, harm to character and appearance, and harm to protected species/biodiversity were not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced (limited/very limited weight), so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy EP3Policy CP9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 143Paragraph 110Paragraph 115
- Judgments
- Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003] UKHL 22; [2003] JPL 1299; Oates v SSCLG [2018] EWCA Civ 2229; Jenson & Anor v Faux [2011] EWCA 423; Gestmin SGPS SA v Credit Suisse (UK) Ltd [2013] EWHC 3560 (Comm); Barrow v Merrett [2021] EWHC 792 (QB)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed9 September 20263345670Link Park Heathrow, Thorney Mill Road, West Drayton, UB7 7EZ
- Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
- Notice upheld3 September 20263345455Willow Tree Farm Love Lane, Iver, SL0 9QZ
- Allowed1 September 20263354729The Park, Wexham Road, Slough, Buckinghamshire, SL2 5QR
- Notice varied and upheld26 August 20263376241The Woollets , Cherry Tree Lane, Fulmer, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6JE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®