Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 September 20253353881

Land North of East Court, Abbey Road, Sheringham, Norfolk, NR26 8HH

Planning appeal 3353881 at Land North of East Court, Abbey Road, Sheringham, Norfolk, NR26 8HH (North Norfolk District Council) was allowed on 12 September 2025 by Inspector Pearce J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the erection of a single storey detached dwelling with rooms in the roof space and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J
Postcode
NR26 8HH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • protected trees, with regard to whether suitable living conditions would be provided for future occupants of the dwelling in respect of natural light
  • the integrity of European sites, with particular regard to recreational pressure

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), and the benefits of housing delivery outweighed the limited harm to character and appearance.

The proposal conflicts with the development plan but the adverse impacts of limited harm to character and appearance would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing supply and delivery when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS 3Policy EN 2Policy EN 4Policy SS 4Policy EN 9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Norfolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 October 20266012576
    3 Appleyard, Holt,, NR25 6AR
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266006363
    Rectory Farm, Aldborough Road, Aldborough, NR11 7NT
  3. Allowed15 October 20266012084
    Hall Farm Barns, Station Road, Thorpe Market, NR11 8UD
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266009067
    Land to the East of Cross Street, Salthouse, Holt, NR25 7XH
  5. Dismissed22 September 20266008881
    The Old Post House, Mundesley Road, Trimingham, NR11 8DZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.