Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld5 June 20263353994

33 Bowstoke Road, Great Barr, BIRMINGHAM, B43 5DJ

the first floor side extension has not been built in accordance with plans approved under DC/22/66719 for first floor side, single storey rear and single storey front extension. The first-floor side extension has been built flush with the front elevation and not setback at the front elevation by 300mm. Furthermore, the roof of the extension has not been lowered from the existing apex of the roof. The set back and step down relate to adopted design guidance, and policies ENV3 (Design Quality) & SAD EOS9 (Urban Design Principles), that were material to the planning

Authority
Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development as built upon the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area

What decided it

The development as built causes harm to the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area by appearing as an incongruous and visually dominant addition that is not subservient to the host dwelling, contrary to adopted design policies.

Plan policies cited: Policy ENV3 (Design Quality) of the Black Country Core Strategy, Policy SAD EOS9 (Urban Design Principles) of the Site Allocations and Delivery Development Plan Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.