Planning appeal decision
Renishaw Plc, Old Town, Wotton Under Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 7DW
Planning appeal 3354249 at Renishaw Plc, Old Town, Wotton Under Edge, Gloucestershire, GL12 7DW (Stroud District Council) was dismissed on 24 March 2025 by Inspector Stephens K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would comply with local and national policies that seek to protect identified employment sites.
Conversion of a former schoolhouse to deliver two dwellings and conversion of office/storage building to deliver two dwellings, and the development of 11 dwellings along with landscaping, drainage and other associated works
- Authority
- Stroud District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Stephens K
- Postcode
- GL12 7DW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would comply with local and national policies that seek to protect identified employment sites
- Whether the proposal (in particular new Block A) would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building known as 'The Cottages' and other nearby listed buildings; the effect of the proposal on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset (the former Sunday School building) and; whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Wotton-under-Edge Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposal on the Cotswold National Landscape
- Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of building B with regard to light, privacy and outlook
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and harm to the non-designated Sunday School building, combined with harm to future occupiers' living conditions, was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the non-designated Sunday School building, together with harm to the living conditions of future occupiers, was not outweighed by the public benefits (heritage restoration, housing including affordable housing, economic and environmental benefits), so the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EI1Policy HC1Policy ES10Policy CP8Policy CP14Policy ES7Policy ES3Policy DHC1Policy DCP1Policy CP2Policy DHC6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 189Paragraph 212Paragraph 214Paragraph 215Paragraph 216
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stroud
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed23 October 20266010245Bassett Court Farm, North Nibley, GL11 6DQ
- Allowed14 October 20266006756Land at Haines Green, Edge Road, Painswick, Gl5 6NE
- Allowed13 October 20266009483Land Northwest of Stonehouse, Grid Ref Easting: 379777. Grid Ref Northing: 207047, Stonehouse, Gl10 3WP
- Allowed5 October 20266007595Land at Epney, Framilode, Gloucester, GL27LL
- Dismissed29 September 20266005652Agricultural Barn, Upton Hill, Upton St Leonards, GL4 8DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®