Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted1 May 20253354264

Pitch 6, Land off Dragons Lane , Sandbach, Cheshire, CW11 3QB

Planning appeal 3354264 at Pitch 6, Land off Dragons Lane , Sandbach, Cheshire, CW11 3QB (Cheshire East) was allowed on 1 May 2025 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is in a suitable location in the countryside and occupants would have reasonable access to facilities and services, having regard to the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), and the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS).

the material change of use of land from an agricultural use to a use as a residential caravan site with one pitch of no more than two caravans (one static and one touring), together with the creation of hardstanding, erection of fences and gates, siting of caravans, and a container, and the erection of a day room and a bin store

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
McGlone A
Postcode
CW11 3QB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is in a suitable location in the countryside and occupants would have reasonable access to facilities and services, having regard to the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), and the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS)
  • the effect of the proposal on the high-pressure gas lines
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the need for, and provision of, sites for gypsies and travellers in the area
  • any other material considerations in support, including alternatives and personal circumstances

What decided it

The unacceptable safety risk to occupiers from proximity to high-pressure gas pipelines, weighed against the personal circumstances of each family, determined whether temporary permission could be justified or whether the notice should be upheld.

Very substantial weight attached to the safety risk from the gas pipelines and moderate harm to character and appearance were weighed against significant to very significant weight given to personal circumstances, best interests of the children, and the lack of a five-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches; permanent permission was refused in every case, but for Appeals A, B and E the balance tipped in favour of a two-year temporary personal permission, while for Appeal C the harm still significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits even on a temporary basis.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PG 6 (CELPS)Policy SC 7 (CELPS)Policy SD 1 (CELPS)Policy SD 2 (CELPS)Policy SE 13 (CELPS)Policy HOU 5 (SADPD)Policy HOU5(3) (SADPD)Policy INF 7(2) (SADPD)Policy ENV 17 (SADPD)Policy PG 10 (SADPD)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 110Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 102
Judgments
Smith v SSLUHC & Ors (2022) EWCA; R (Ardagh Glass Ltd) v Chester CC [2009]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

26 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire East

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 October 20266004692
    Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
  2. Allowed5 October 20266008576
    Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
  3. Allowed30 September 20266008176
    Sycamore Farm, Well Bank Lane, Over Peover, WA16 8UN
  4. Allowed22 September 20266007422
    Brookfields Farm, Longhill Lane, Hankelow, CW3 0JQ
  5. Allowed10 August 20263374597
    Land at Prestbury Road, Macclesfield

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.