Planning appeal decision
Pitch 11, Land at Dragons Lane , Sandbach, Cheshire, CW11 3QB
Planning appeal 3354270 at Pitch 11, Land at Dragons Lane , Sandbach, Cheshire, CW11 3QB (Cheshire East) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 1 May 2025 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is in a suitable location in the countryside and occupants would have reasonable access to facilities and services, having regard to the development plan, the Framework, and the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS).
Material change of use of agricultural land to residential caravan sites (Gypsy and Traveller pitches) with hardstanding, fencing/gates, caravans and ancillary day-room/utility buildings, subject of four enforcement notice appeals (Pitches 6, 8, 11, 12) and one section 78 appeal for Pitch 12
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- McGlone A
- Postcode
- CW11 3QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is in a suitable location in the countryside and occupants would have reasonable access to facilities and services, having regard to the development plan, the Framework, and the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS)
- the effect of the proposal on the high-pressure gas lines
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the need for, and provision of, sites for gypsies and travellers in the area
- any other material considerations in support, including alternatives and personal circumstances
What decided it
The unacceptable safety risk to occupiers from proximity to the high-pressure gas pipelines, balanced against the personal circumstances/best interests of the children and the lack of a five-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches, determined whether a temporary personal permission was justified (Appeals A, B and E) or not (Appeal C).
The very substantial harm from an unacceptable safety risk and moderate/limited harm to character and appearance were weighed against significant/very significant weight afforded to personal circumstances, best interests of the children, and the lack of a five-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches; the balance tipped in favour of temporary personal planning permissions for Appeals A, B and E, but against permission (even temporary) for Appeal C.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CELPS Policy PG 6CELPS Policy SC 7CELPS Policy SD 1CELPS Policy SD 2CELPS Policy SE 13SADPD Policy HOU 5SADPD Policy HOU 5(3)SADPD Policy PG 10SADPD Policy INF 7(2)SADPD Policy ENV 17
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 110Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 102
- Judgments
- Smith v SSLUHC & Ors (2022) EWCA; R (Ardagh Glass Ltd) v Chester CC [2009]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266004692Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
- Allowed5 October 20266008576Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
- Allowed30 September 20266008176Sycamore Farm, Well Bank Lane, Over Peover, WA16 8UN
- Allowed22 September 20266007422Brookfields Farm, Longhill Lane, Hankelow, CW3 0JQ
- Allowed10 August 20263374597Land at Prestbury Road, Macclesfield
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®