Planning appeal decision
Pitch 12, Land at Dragons Lane, Sandbach, CW11 3QB
Planning appeal 3354285 at Pitch 12, Land at Dragons Lane, Sandbach, CW11 3QB (Cheshire East) was allowed on 1 May 2025 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is in a suitable location in the countryside and occupants would have reasonable access to facilities and services, having regard to the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), and the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS).
the material change of use of land from an agricultural use to a use as a residential caravan site with one pitch of no more than two caravans (one static and one touring), together with the creation of hardstanding, erection of fences and gates, siting of caravans, and a container, and the erection of a day room and a bin store
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- McGlone A
- Postcode
- CW11 3QB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is in a suitable location in the countryside and occupants would have reasonable access to facilities and services, having regard to the development plan, the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), and the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS)
- the effect of the proposal on the high-pressure gas lines
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the need for, and provision of, sites for gypsies and travellers in the area
- any other material considerations in support, including alternatives and personal circumstances
What decided it
The safety risk from close proximity to the high-pressure gas pipelines (weighed against personal circumstances, best interests of children and the lack of a five-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches) determined whether temporary permission could be justified in each case.
In Appeals A, B and E the very significant/significant weight of personal circumstances, best interests of children and the lack of a five-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller sites meant the adverse impacts of a two-year temporary permission did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits; in Appeal C the identified harms (safety risk, character harm, IUD) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits even for a temporary permission, so it was refused.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG 6Policy SC 7Policy SD 1Policy SD 2Policy SE 13Policy HOU 5Policy HOU 5(3)Policy PG 10Policy INF 7Policy INF 7(2)Policy ENV 17
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 102Paragraph 110Paragraph 135Paragraph 139
- Judgments
- Smith v SSLUHC & Ors (2022) EWCA; R (Ardagh Glass Ltd) v Chester CC [2009]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266004692Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
- Allowed5 October 20266008576Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
- Allowed30 September 20266008176Sycamore Farm, Well Bank Lane, Over Peover, WA16 8UN
- Allowed22 September 20266007422Brookfields Farm, Longhill Lane, Hankelow, CW3 0JQ
- Allowed10 August 20263374597Land at Prestbury Road, Macclesfield
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®