Planning appeal decision
Land South of Kenley Aerodrome, Victor Beamish Avenue, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 5FX
Planning appeal 3354498 at Land South of Kenley Aerodrome, Victor Beamish Avenue, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 5FX (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 11 April 2025 by Inspector Davies B, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is grey belt land, having regard to the consideration of the effect on heritage assets.
80no. residential dwellings including 50% affordable housing, associated landscaping, amenity space and car parking (outline application all matters reserved aside from access)
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Davies B
- Postcode
- CR3 5FX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is grey belt land, having regard to the consideration of the effect on heritage assets
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the sustainability of the location and the Golden Rules
- the effect on provision of local sports facilities
What decided it
The site's classification as grey belt land meeting all Green Belt tests, combined with the severe shortfall in housing land supply (1.92 years) and compliance with the Golden Rules, meant the substantial benefits of the scheme were found to significantly outweigh the minor heritage harm.
The very substantial benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery, brownfield reuse, heritage enhancement, highway and recreational improvements, and economic benefits significantly outweighed the small adverse weight attributed to loss of the non-designated former workshop, and the proposal was found to accord with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP20Policy DP10Policy DP18Policy DP19Policy DP7Policy DP1Policy CSP1Policy CSP2Policy CSP3Policy CSP4Policy CSP7Policy CSP13Policy CSP17Policy CSP 21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 57Paragraph 66Paragraph 98Paragraph 104Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 125Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 158Paragraph 159Paragraph 216
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Allowed13 July 20266002345Land Adjacent to Heathview, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, RH7 6LG
- Allowed13 July 20266002255Winnies Woodland, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, Lingfield, RH7 6LG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®