Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Blagrove Lane, Wokingham , RG41 4AX
Planning appeal 3354667 at Land Adjacent to Blagrove Lane, Wokingham , RG41 4AX (Wokingham Borough Council) was allowed on 29 May 2025 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy in the development plan.
an outline application, with all matters reserved except for access, for the proposed erection of up to 350 dwellings (Use Class C3) and care home (Use Class C2), with new accesses onto Barkham Road and Blagrove Lane, landscaping and onsite SANG, following demolition of outbuildings and agricultural buildings
- Authority
- Wokingham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- McGlone A
- Postcode
- RG41 4AX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy in the development plan
- whether the proposed development would cause the coalescence of Wokingham and Barkham
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including on the surrounding landscape and Bottle Copse Local Wildlife Site
- the effect of the proposed development on the Thames Basin Heath Special Protection Area
- whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for affordable housing, the care home, on and off-site highway works, sustainable travel infrastructure, public open space and allotment facilities, local employment skills, and the NHS
What decided it
The severe five-year housing land supply shortfall (1.7 years) meant the most important development plan policies were out of date, and the substantial weight attached to the resulting market and affordable housing benefits outweighed the identified moderate/significant harms.
The moderate harm to the spatial strategy and character/appearance, the significant harm from coalescence and loss of green infrastructure, and the less than substantial (low end) heritage harm were outweighed by the substantial weight given to market and affordable housing delivery, the care home, economic benefits and biodiversity net gain, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy CP17MDD Policy CC02CS Policy CP11CS Policy CP9MDD Policy TB21MDD Policy CC03CS Policy CP1CS Policy CP3CS Policy CP5CS Policy CP2CS Policy CP6CS Policy CP7CS Policy CP8CS Policy CP10CS Policy CP21MDD Policy TB5MDD Policy TB8MDD Policy TB12MDD Policy TB23MDD Policy TB24MDD Policy CC01saved SEP Policy NRM6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 135Paragraph 187Paragraph 193Paragraph 139Paragraph 110Paragraph 58Paragraph 182
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed21 July 20266008845Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
- Allowed8 June 20263371069Land North of Reading Road, Arborfield, RG2 9HN
- Notice varied and upheld1 May 20263346384Old Billingbear Brickworks, Carters Hill, Binfield, Wokingham, RG40 5RS
- Notice upheld10 March 20263374730Land at Gravelley Bridge Farm, Grazeley Green Road, Grazeley, Reading, RG7 1LG
- Dismissed9 March 20263361360Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®