Planning appeal decision
45 Etherley Grange, Bishop Auckland, Durham, DL14 0JZ
Planning appeal 3354705 at 45 Etherley Grange, Bishop Auckland, Durham, DL14 0JZ (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 16 April 2025 by Inspector Dean S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to its effects on character and appearance of the area and its sustainability.
a single dwelling within the garden with matters of access, appearance, layout and scale considered (landscaping reserved)
- Authority
- Durham County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Dean S
- Postcode
- DL14 0JZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposal having regard to its effects on character and appearance of the area and its sustainability
- whether the site can be suitably accessed
- whether the site could be made safe and stable
- whether the proposal would have an acceptable effect on nearby trees
- whether the proposal is required to deliver biodiversity net gain and whether or not it does so
- whether the proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of adjoining properties with specific regard to overdominance, overbearing and loss of privacy
What decided it
The site is not a suitable location for the development due to its harmful effects on settlement character, unsustainability, inadequate access arrangements, loss of trees of high amenity value, and failure to deliver biodiversity net gain as required by the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 6Policy 21Policy 29Policy 31Policy 32Policy 39Policy 40Policy 41
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 12
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Durham County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed22 October 20266007418Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
- Allowed25 September 20266003865The Boathouse Inn, Elvet Bridge, Durham, DH1 3AF
- Dismissed16 September 202660059693 Roosevelt Road, Durham, DH1 1PS
- Dismissed16 September 20266004850119 Bradford Crescent, Durham, DH1 1HW
- Dismissed16 September 2026600449449 Annand Road, Durham, DH1 1PW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®