Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 February 20253354860

30 Harwood Road, London, SW6 4PH

Planning appeal 3354860 at 30 Harwood Road, London, SW6 4PH (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 25 February 2025 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling, the terrace of which it forms part and that of the local area, with reference to the Walham Green Conservation Area.

the erection of an additional floor at roof level; erection of a rear extension at second floor level, over part of the existing back addition; erection of a part one, part two storey rear extension at ground and first floor level, to the side and rear of the existing back addition; and replacement of all windows to the front and rear elevations

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
SW6 4PH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling, the terrace of which it forms part and that of the local area, with reference to the Walham Green Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed second floor roof extension would eliminate the existing butterfly roof form and replicate harmful extensions on neighbouring properties, resulting in significant harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the non-designated heritage asset that outweighs any public benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DC1DC4DC8CAG 2CAG 3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 773 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.