Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 July 20253354937

Copes Of Earlswood Ltd, Juggins Lane, Earlswood, SOLIHULL, B94 5LL

demolition of existing commercial buildings and change of use of land for the stationing of 29 no. mobile homes for holiday let purposes

Authority
Stratford-on-Avon District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Major retail and services
Inspector
Thandi B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the provision of employment land
  • Whether the proposal would be an appropriate location for tourism accommodation having regard to access to services and facilities
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of existing neighbouring occupiers in respect of overlooking
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers
  • The effect of the proposal upon the safe and efficient operation of the local highway network
  • The effect upon protected species and biodiversity
  • The effect upon trees and ancient woodland
  • Flood risk
  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect upon openness
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would not be justified by very special circumstances, compounded by unresolved concerns regarding ancient woodland deterioration, flood risk, and land contamination affecting future occupiers.

Framework references: 88, 89, 110, 116, 143, 153, 154, 170, 193

Plan policies cited: Policy CS.22, Policy AS.10, Policy CS.24, Policy CS.15, Policy CS.5, Policy CS.9, Policy BE1, Policy NE1, Policy CS.26, Policy BE2, Policy CS.6, Policy NE2, Policy CS.4, Policy CS.10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.