Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 July 20253354937

Copes Of Earlswood Ltd, Juggins Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LL

Planning appeal 3354937 at Copes Of Earlswood Ltd, Juggins Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LL (Stratford-on-Avon District Council) was dismissed on 15 July 2025 by Inspector Thandi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the provision of employment land.

demolition of existing commercial buildings and change of use of land for the stationing of 29 no. mobile homes for holiday let purposes

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Major retail and services
Inspector
Thandi B
Postcode
B94 5LL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the provision of employment land
  • Whether the proposal would be an appropriate location for tourism accommodation having regard to access to services and facilities
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of existing neighbouring occupiers in respect of overlooking
  • Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers
  • The effect of the proposal upon the safe and efficient operation of the local highway network
  • The effect upon protected species and biodiversity
  • The effect upon trees and ancient woodland
  • Flood risk
  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect upon openness
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would not be justified by very special circumstances, compounded by unresolved concerns regarding ancient woodland deterioration, flood risk, and land contamination affecting future occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS.22Policy AS.10Policy CS.24Policy CS.15Policy CS.5Policy CS.9Policy BE1Policy NE1Policy CS.26Policy BE2Policy CS.6Policy NE2Policy CS.4Policy CS.10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 88Paragraph 89Paragraph 110Paragraph 116Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 170Paragraph 193

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

42 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stratford-on-Avon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013252
    Land at Oaktree Close, Bearley, CV37 0SD
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266011546
    Chatsworth House, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5DP
  3. Allowed13 July 20266002929
    Land South of Junction 12, M40, Gaydon, CV35 0HF
  4. Allowed13 July 20266003218
    Westview, Springbrook Lane, Earlswood, B94 5SG
  5. Allowed6 July 20266008094
    Fayre Oaks, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5HX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.