Planning appeal decision
Copes Of Earlswood Ltd, Juggins Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LL
Planning appeal 3354937 at Copes Of Earlswood Ltd, Juggins Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5LL (Stratford-on-Avon District Council) was dismissed on 15 July 2025 by Inspector Thandi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the provision of employment land.
demolition of existing commercial buildings and change of use of land for the stationing of 29 no. mobile homes for holiday let purposes
- Authority
- Stratford-on-Avon District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Major retail and services
- Inspector
- Thandi B
- Postcode
- B94 5LL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development upon the provision of employment land
- Whether the proposal would be an appropriate location for tourism accommodation having regard to access to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of existing neighbouring occupiers in respect of overlooking
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers
- The effect of the proposal upon the safe and efficient operation of the local highway network
- The effect upon protected species and biodiversity
- The effect upon trees and ancient woodland
- Flood risk
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to relevant development policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
- The effect upon openness
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposed development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would not be justified by very special circumstances, compounded by unresolved concerns regarding ancient woodland deterioration, flood risk, and land contamination affecting future occupiers.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS.22Policy AS.10Policy CS.24Policy CS.15Policy CS.5Policy CS.9Policy BE1Policy NE1Policy CS.26Policy BE2Policy CS.6Policy NE2Policy CS.4Policy CS.10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 88Paragraph 89Paragraph 110Paragraph 116Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 170Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stratford-on-Avon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 20266013252Land at Oaktree Close, Bearley, CV37 0SD
- Dismissed23 October 20266011546Chatsworth House, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5DP
- Allowed13 July 20266002929Land South of Junction 12, M40, Gaydon, CV35 0HF
- Allowed13 July 20266003218Westview, Springbrook Lane, Earlswood, B94 5SG
- Allowed6 July 20266008094Fayre Oaks, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5HX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®