Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 July 20266003218

Westview, Springbrook Lane, Earlswood, B94 5SG

Planning appeal 6003218 at Westview, Springbrook Lane, Earlswood, B94 5SG (Stratford-on-Avon) was allowed on 13 July 2026 by Inspector Hannah Guest, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the disputed condition is necessary to safeguard the character and appearance of the Arden Special Landscape Area.

Erection of self-build replacement dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Hannah Guest
Postcode
B94 5SG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the disputed condition is necessary to safeguard the character and appearance of the Arden Special Landscape Area
  • whether the disputed condition is necessary to preserve the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the disputed condition is necessary to protect the form and bulk of the approved dwelling and character and appearance of its rural setting
  • whether the disputed condition is necessary to ensure the continued compliance of the approved development with national and local Green Belt policy
  • if so, whether the condition meets the other tests set out at paragraph 57 of the National Planning Policy Framework

What decided it

The disputed condition failed the necessity test because Class E structures would be limited in scale and siting, would remain subordinate to the approved dwelling, and would not materially harm the landscape character, Green Belt openness, or rural setting, particularly given that permitted development rights for enlargement of the dwelling itself were retained.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS.5Policy CS.9Policy CS.10Policy CS.12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 55Paragraph 142Paragraph 154Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

35 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Stratford-on-Avon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013252
    Land at Oaktree Close, Bearley, CV37 0SD
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266011546
    Chatsworth House, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5DP
  3. Allowed6 July 20266008094
    Fayre Oaks, Broad Lane, Tanworth-in-Arden, B94 5HX
  4. Dismissed5 June 20266004033
    Bears Cottage, Gorcott Hill, Redditch, B98 9EN
  5. Dismissed28 May 20266005118
    Grovewood, Ullenhall Lane, Beoley, B95 5PP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.