Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 May 20253354948

44 Lambert Road, London, SW2 5BE

Planning appeal 3354948 at 44 Lambert Road, London, SW2 5BE (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 21 May 2025 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the use of the appeal property as a larger HMO would be acceptable in terms of its effect on housing supply and the housing mix in the borough.

the use of the premises as a large HMO with 11 units

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Cryan M
Postcode
SW2 5BE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the use of the appeal property as a larger HMO would be acceptable in terms of its effect on housing supply and the housing mix in the borough
  • Whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for all occupiers, with particular regard to the adequacy of kitchen, toilet and bathroom facilities
  • Whether the development would adequately promote sustainable means of travel, and mitigate its effects on the surrounding highway and transport networks

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole due to significant shortcomings in living conditions (inadequate kitchen, bathroom and WC facilities) and failure to adequately promote sustainable means of travel and mitigate highway impacts through secured planning obligations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H3Policy H9Policy H8Policy D6Policy T3Policy Q13Policy T6Policy D4London Plan Policy H8London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy T5London Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T6.1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

712 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed16 October 20266009699
    28 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266007861
    The Park, 56 Elder Road, West Norwood, London, SE27 9ND
  3. Dismissed11 August 20266009353
    62A Upper Tulse Hill, London, SW2 2RW
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266005770
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266005768
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.