Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision28 July 20263355237

10A Mapesbury Road, London, NW2 4JB

Planning appeal 3355237 at 10A Mapesbury Road, London, NW2 4JB (London Borough of Brent) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 28 July 2026 by Inspector Robbie G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether condition 7 of the 2018 permission (details of external materials including boundary treatments) should be discharged and substituted with alternatively worded conditions, with particular regard to the effects upon the character and appearance of the appeal property and surrounding area and the Brondesbury Conservation Area.

the breach of condition 7 of planning permission ref 18/0236 granted on 16 August 2018

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Robbie G
Postcode
NW2 4JB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether condition 7 of the 2018 permission (details of external materials including boundary treatments) should be discharged and substituted with alternatively worded conditions, with particular regard to the effects upon the character and appearance of the appeal property and surrounding area and the Brondesbury Conservation Area
  • Whether conditions 2, 4 and 6 of the 2019 permission (approved drawings, landscaping and planting works, and refuse/recycling/cycle parking facilities) should be discharged and substituted with alternatively worded conditions, with particular regard to the effects upon the character and appearance of the appeal property and surrounding area and the Brondesbury Conservation Area, and the provision of facilities for refuse, recycling and cycle parking

What decided it

The plastic sheeting and artificial hedging were visually intrusive and incongruous features wholly at odds with the verdant character and appearance of Mapesbury Road and the conservation area, with no public benefits to overcome the identified harm; conversely, the alternative scheme for the forecourt layout and facilities provision would accord with development plan policies and preserve the character of the area.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area caused by the plastic sheeting was not outweighed by any public benefits; the alternative scheme for the hardstanding and landscaping struck an appropriate balance by reducing hard surfacing and increasing soft landscaping consistent with the street's character

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy BHC1Policy BT2Policy BSUI3London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy SI13

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 825 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  3. Notice upheld24 September 20263365164
    Land and Garage, Rear of 21 Ivy Road and Adjacent to 31 Cedar Road, London, NW2 6SN
  4. Split Decision17 September 20263357462
    61 Alder Grove, London, NW2 7DE
  5. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.