Planning appeal decision
Land off Mill Lane, Keelby, Grimsby, DN41 8HB
Planning appeal 3355400 at Land off Mill Lane, Keelby, Grimsby, DN41 8HB (West Lindsey District Council) was dismissed on 14 July 2025 by Inspector Veevers A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is a suitable location for housing, with particular regard to the local development plan spatial strategy.
residential development comprising 36no. dwellings
- Authority
- West Lindsey District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Veevers A
- Postcode
- DN41 8EW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is a suitable location for housing, with particular regard to the local development plan spatial strategy
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to local policies relating to Important Open Space and landscape
- Whether the proposed development would preserve the settings of nearby listed buildings or any features of special architectural or historic interest which they may possess
- The effect of the proposed development on great crested newts (GCN)
- Whether any harm identified, including conflict with the development plan, would be outweighed by other material planning considerations
What decided it
The site's location outside the settlement's developed footprint and the resulting conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy for directing growth in large villages outweighed the benefits of the scheme.
The significant weight attributed to the conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy for large villages was found to outweigh the significant and other benefits of the scheme (including affordable housing, allotment land transfer, BNG and sustainability benefits), tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S4Policy S65Policy S57Policy S60Policy S61Policy S64Policy S51Policy S22Policy S6Policy S7Policy S80Policy 1Policy 5Policy 2bPolicy 3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 78Paragraph 106Paragraph 187Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 57Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Morge v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC 2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Lindsey
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed24 June 20266006265Land Adjacent to Rose Cottage, High Street, Faldingworth, Nr Market Rasen, LN8 3SE
- Dismissed16 January 20263363738Land to the West of Westmoreland Avenue, Scampton, LN1 2UW
- Dismissed4 September 202533674225 Hawthorn Avenue, Cherry Willingham, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN3 4JS
- Allowed19 August 20253363211Land at Willingham-by-Stow Farm, Marton Road, Stow, Lincoln, DN21 5BH
- Dismissed11 August 20253355755Sunnyside Up Farm Shop, Poplar Farm, Market Rasen, LN8 3UL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®