Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 July 20253355413

171 Marle Place, Leylands Road, Burgess Hill , West Sussex , RH15 8HZ

Planning appeal 3355413 at 171 Marle Place, Leylands Road, Burgess Hill , West Sussex , RH15 8HZ (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 3 July 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the perimeter fence and proposed MUGA would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Johns Conservation Area.

the installation of multi-use games area, play area, trim trail, horticulture area, sensory garden, vehicular access security gate and fence, internal partition fences, perimeter security fences, soft/hard landscaping and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other minor developments
Inspector
Goldberg V
Postcode
RH15 8HZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the perimeter fence and proposed MUGA would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Johns Conservation Area
  • the effect of the perimeter fence and proposed MUGA on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset (NDHA) known as 171 Marle Place (Hambrook School), through development within its setting
  • the effect of the proposed MUGA on protected trees within the site

What decided it

The perimeter fence's failure to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area, combined with the MUGA's unacceptable impact on protected trees and negative effect on the non-designated heritage asset's significance, could not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DP26DP35DP34DP37Policy H1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

65 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Sussex

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266015120
    5, Dexter Drive, East Grinstead, RH19 4SU
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266012781
    11 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
  3. Dismissed9 October 20266010262
    Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
  4. Dismissed9 October 20266005209
    Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
  5. Dismissed9 October 20266005206
    Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.