Planning appeal decision
171 Marle Place, Leylands Road, Burgess Hill , West Sussex , RH15 8HZ
Planning appeal 3355413 at 171 Marle Place, Leylands Road, Burgess Hill , West Sussex , RH15 8HZ (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 3 July 2025 by Inspector Goldberg V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the perimeter fence and proposed MUGA would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Johns Conservation Area.
the installation of multi-use games area, play area, trim trail, horticulture area, sensory garden, vehicular access security gate and fence, internal partition fences, perimeter security fences, soft/hard landscaping and associated works
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Goldberg V
- Postcode
- RH15 8HZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the perimeter fence and proposed MUGA would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Johns Conservation Area
- the effect of the perimeter fence and proposed MUGA on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset (NDHA) known as 171 Marle Place (Hambrook School), through development within its setting
- the effect of the proposed MUGA on protected trees within the site
What decided it
The perimeter fence's failure to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area, combined with the MUGA's unacceptable impact on protected trees and negative effect on the non-designated heritage asset's significance, could not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DP26DP35DP34DP37Policy H1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 October 202660151205, Dexter Drive, East Grinstead, RH19 4SU
- Dismissed22 October 2026601278111 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
- Dismissed9 October 20266010262Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
- Dismissed9 October 20266005209Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
- Dismissed9 October 20266005206Lullings Cottage, West Hill, Ardingly, RH17 6QY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®