Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 July 20253355546

Horsham Golf Club, Denne Park, Horsham , RH13 0AX

Planning appeal 3355546 at Horsham Golf Club, Denne Park, Horsham , RH13 0AX (Horsham District Council) was allowed on 11 July 2025 by Inspector Young D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The degree to which the proposed development would result in landscape and visual harm to the local area.

the development of a Sports and Leisure Hub including the provision of communal facilities, nursery, golf college, sports club house (containing health & fitness spa, changing facilities and food & beverage) and an educational facility for Warren Clark Golfing Dreams (Use Classes E, F1 & F2); a local centre containing a convenience store and co-working space (Use Classes E & F2); the provision of supporting landscaping, open space and related infrastructure; outdoor sports and leisure provision comprising driving range, reprovision of golf (including supporting golf facilities) and hockey (including pitches and training area) (Use Class F2) and up to 800 dwellings (Use Class C3) (all matters reserved save for access)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Young D
Postcode
RH13 0AX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The degree to which the proposed development would result in landscape and visual harm to the local area
  • Whether future residents of the development would be able to conveniently access local facilities including education provision through non-car modes of transport
  • Overall compliance with the Development Plan and whether any harms would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the appeal scheme

What decided it

The overriding and urgent need for housing, combined with the Council's inability to demonstrate anything close to a five-year housing land supply, meant the substantial benefits of the scheme clearly outweighed the moderate landscape harm and policy conflicts.

The very substantial benefits of housing delivery, the water neutrality solution, sports and community facilities, and transport improvements clearly outweighed the moderate landscape harm and conflict with HDPF Policies 25, 26 and 27 and SNP Policy 1, even on a flat section 38(6) balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 25Policy 26Policy 27Policy 40HDPF Policy 1SNP Policy 1Policy 9 of the Southwater Neighbourhood PlanPolicy M9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 14Paragraph 69Paragraph 70Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 110Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 119Paragraph 201

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Horsham District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed29 October 20266008830
    Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266007051
    Bentley House, North Heath Lane Industrial Estate, North Heath Lane, Horsham, RH12 5QE
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266012640
    The Fords, Bonfire Hill, Southwater, RH13 9BU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266011680
    Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP
  5. Allowed25 September 20266010268
    Priory Field Barn, Monastery Lane, Storrington, RH20 4LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.