Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 June 20253355754

Land Rear of Garrick House, 161 -163 High Street, London, TW12 1BZ

Planning appeal 3355754 at Land Rear of Garrick House, 161 -163 High Street, London, TW12 1BZ (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 June 2025 by Inspector Perrins N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on parking provision in the area and highway safety.

Redevelopment of 6 No. car parking spaces and adjacent land to provide a single detached 2 storey building comprised of 2 No. 2 bed dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Perrins N
Postcode
TW12 1NG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on parking provision in the area and highway safety
  • The provision of affordable housing
  • The living conditions of the neighbouring property No 1 Radcliff Mews

What decided it

The failure to adequately demonstrate that the loss of 6 existing parking spaces would not result in unacceptable harm to highway safety and the operation of the local highway network through increased parking stress.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T6.1 of the London Plan 2021Policy 44 of the Richmond Local Plan 2018Policy 45 of the Richmond Local Plan 2018Policy 36 of the Richmond Local Plan 2018Policy LP8 of the Richmond Local Plan 2018Policy 46 of the Emerging Local PlanEmerging Policy 47 of the Draft Publication Version Local PlanEmerging Policy 48 of the Draft Publication Version Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 49Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

396 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266007390
    1-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
  3. Dismissed22 July 20266003237
    Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
  4. Dismissed14 July 20266004492
    59-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
  5. Dismissed7 July 20266010184
    69 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.