Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 March 20253356110

Unit 1 and Unit 2, Westpoint Enterprise Park, Clarance Avenue, Trafford Park, Trafford, M17 1QS

Planning appeal 3356110 at Unit 1 and Unit 2, Westpoint Enterprise Park, Clarance Avenue, Trafford Park, Trafford, M17 1QS (Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 March 2025 by Inspector Clowes M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on employment land supply.

the ‘change of use of industrial/ warehouse building (units 1 & 2) to form gymnasium and gymnastics units, area of new mezzanine floor, together with alternate paint colour to external cladding & associated minor external alterations.’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Clowes M
Postcode
M17 1QS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on employment land supply
  • The effect of the proposed development on the vitality and viability of town centres

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the employment use is redundant or that there is a definitive need for the proposed leisure uses in this specific locality, combined with the lack of an impact assessment on town centre vitality and viability, means the proposal conflicts with development plan policies protecting employment land and town centres.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy W1Policy W1.12Policy W2.12Policy JP-Strat1Policy JP-P2Policy JP-P6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 85Paragraph 87Paragraph 91Paragraph 94

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed10 September 20266007395
    57 Lock Road, Broadheath, Altrincham, WA14 4HQ
  2. Allowed14 August 20266008227
    Land At Rear Of 30 Croftsbank Road, And To Side Of 5 Primrose Avenue, Urmston, M41 0TY
  3. Dismissed22 April 20266003157
    48 Alphonsus Street, Manchester, Gt Man, M16 7QS
  4. Dismissed8 April 20266003426
    46C, Riddings Road, Altrincham, Cheshire, WA156BP
  5. Allowed22 December 20253367470
    Voltage Park, Manchester Road, Carrington, Trafford, M31 4BR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.