Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 February 20253356291

Land to the North East of Newton Aycliffe Magistrates Court, Central Avenue, Newton Aycliffe, DL5 5RT

Planning appeal 3356291 at Land to the North East of Newton Aycliffe Magistrates Court, Central Avenue, Newton Aycliffe, DL5 5RT (Durham County Council) was allowed on 28 February 2025 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.

the installation of a 20m phase 7.2 street works pole and wrap around cabinet with 3 No ancillary equipment cabinets, 2 No dishes, 9 No antennas, 2 No GPS nodes and ancillary equipment

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Harrison F
Postcode
DL5 4DH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The absence of suitable alternative sites and the demonstrated need for the installation to be sited at this location, combined with the benefits of reliable communications infrastructure, outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 6Policy 29Policy 27
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 122

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Durham County Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266007418
    Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
  2. Allowed25 September 20266003865
    The Boathouse Inn, Elvet Bridge, Durham, DH1 3AF
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266005969
    3 Roosevelt Road, Durham, DH1 1PS
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266004850
    119 Bradford Crescent, Durham, DH1 1HW
  5. Dismissed16 September 20266004494
    49 Annand Road, Durham, DH1 1PW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.