Planning appeal decision
Land north of Henley Road, Budbrooke, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 8RA
change of use of land to use as residential caravan site for 12 gypsy/traveller families, each with two caravans including no more than one static caravan/mobile home, together with laying of hardstanding and improvement of existing access
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Dyer S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the use of the land for a gypsy and traveller site is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, the PPTS and any relevant development plan policies.
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
- Whether the development provides appropriate living conditions for the occupiers with particular regard to: noise arising from traffic using the M40; the management of surface and foul water drainage within the site; the management of waste within the site.
- The effect of the use of the site on: the risk of flooding off site; biodiversity.
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development.
What decided it
The lack of a five year supply of deliverable gypsy/traveller sites and absence of alternative sites meant the identified benefits and PPTS/paragraph 11(d) presumption outweighed the noise harm and IUD, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
The significant weight attached to noise harm to living conditions and moderate weight attached to intentional unauthorised development did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the significant benefits of meeting unmet gypsy/traveller need, compliance with Policy H8, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development, so the balance tipped in favour of allowing the appeal.
Framework references: 11, 110, 115
Plan policies cited: Policy DS18, Policy H8, Policy BE3, Policy BE1, Policy FW1, Policy FW2, Policy NE2, Policy NE3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®