Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 September 20253356326

Land North of Henley Road, Budbrooke, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 8RA

Planning appeal 3356326 at Land North of Henley Road, Budbrooke, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV35 8RA (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 8 September 2025 by Inspector Dyer S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the use of the land for a gypsy and traveller site is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, the PPTS and any relevant development plan policies.

change of use of land to use as residential caravan site for 12 gypsy/traveller families, each with two caravans including no more than one static caravan/mobile home, together with laying of hardstanding and improvement of existing access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Dyer S
Postcode
CV35 8RB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the use of the land for a gypsy and traveller site is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, the PPTS and any relevant development plan policies.
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
  • Whether the development provides appropriate living conditions for the occupiers with particular regard to: noise arising from traffic using the M40; the management of surface and foul water drainage within the site; the management of waste within the site.
  • The effect of the use of the site on: the risk of flooding off site; biodiversity.
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development.

What decided it

The lack of a five year supply of deliverable gypsy/traveller sites and absence of alternative sites meant the identified benefits and PPTS/paragraph 11(d) presumption outweighed the noise harm and IUD, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.

The significant weight attached to noise harm to living conditions and moderate weight attached to intentional unauthorised development did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the significant benefits of meeting unmet gypsy/traveller need, compliance with Policy H8, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development, so the balance tipped in favour of allowing the appeal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DS18Policy H8Policy BE3Policy BE1Policy FW1Policy FW2Policy NE2Policy NE3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Warwick

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011601
    Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
  2. Dismissed23 September 20266006637
    Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
  3. Quashed On Legal Grounds21 September 20263372335
    Land to South West of Providence Lodge, Bakers Lane, Knowle, Solihull, B93 8PT
  4. Allowed2 September 20266007651
    Land to the South of Harbury Lane, Warwick, CV34 7BR
  5. Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263371248
    Worms Seven Farm, Plot 2, Bakers Lane, Knowle, Solihull, B93 8PT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.