Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 April 20253356438

6 Woodland Way, Crowhurst, Battle, TN33 9AP

Planning appeal 3356438 at 6 Woodland Way, Crowhurst, Battle, TN33 9AP (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 7 April 2025 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location having regard to the strategic gap and the character and appearance of the area.

a detached dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S
Postcode
TN33 9AP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location having regard to the strategic gap and the character and appearance of the area
  • whether there is sufficient information on biodiversity and protected species

What decided it

The harm caused by the proposal to the strategic gap, character and appearance of the area, and failure to provide sufficient information on biodiversity and protected species significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing supply and economic contribution.

The benefits of housing supply and economic benefits were attributed considerable weight, but the long-lasting harms to the strategic gap, character and appearance, and environmental protection weighed significantly against the proposal, such that the impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DEN3Policy EN3Policy EN5Policy DEN4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rother District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266015532
    65 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266007775
    Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
  3. Dismissed12 October 20266010105
    Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
  4. Dismissed22 September 20266008634
    Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
  5. Allowed21 September 20266009677
    Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.