Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 May 20253356449

Express Tyres Ltd, 351 High Road, Harrow, HA3 5EQ

Planning appeal 3356449 at Express Tyres Ltd, 351 High Road, Harrow, HA3 5EQ (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 8 May 2025 by Inspector Skelly C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal makes adequate provision for servicing arrangements and the safe access and operation of the local highway network with regards to vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians.

demolition of existing timber rear extension; Erection of a single storey rear extension to facilitate the retention of the use of the site as a Tyre Repair Shop (Use class Sui Generis); Associated external alterations to the rear; removal of existing signage. Part Retrospective

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Skelly C
Postcode
HA3 5EQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for servicing arrangements and the safe access and operation of the local highway network with regards to vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians
  • the effect of the proposal on the vitality and viability of the retail unit and surrounding local centre
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for the management of waste for the proposal and the existing flats

What decided it

The proposal would fail to make adequate provision for safe servicing and highway access, and adequate waste management, thereby harming the viability of the retail unit and local centre in conflict with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1Policy DM40Policy DM42Policy DM44Policy DM45

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

432 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed5 October 20266005188
    147 Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2 8RR
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266005822
    Former National Grid Site, Marsh Lane, Stanmore, HA7 2SN
  3. Dismissed21 September 20266010702
    28 Wychwood Close, Canons Park, Edgware, HA8 6TE
  4. Allowed28 August 20266009581
    306A Harrow View, Harrow, HA2 6QQ
  5. Allowed11 August 20266011021
    90 Woodlands, North Harrow, Harrow, HA2 6EW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.