Planning appeal decision
Manor Farm, Land to the East of Denchworth, Oxfordshire, OX12 0HP
Planning appeal 3356504 at Manor Farm, Land to the East of Denchworth, Oxfordshire, OX12 0HP (Vale of White Horse District Council) was allowed on 3 April 2025 by Inspector Rennie S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would result in harm to the landscape character, historic features and tranquillity of the area, including the wider setting of the North Wessex Downs National Landscape.
for the construction and operation of a solar photovoltaic (PV) farm with associated infrastructure, including inverters, transformers/power stations, substations, security cameras, fencing, access tracks and landscaping
- Authority
- Vale of White Horse District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- utilities-energy · Major offices/R&D/light industry
- Inspector
- Rennie S
- Postcode
- OX12 0HP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would result in harm to the landscape character, historic features and tranquillity of the area, including the wider setting of the North Wessex Downs National Landscape.
- Whether the proposed development would result in material effects to the setting of nearby listed buildings and the Denchworth Conservation Area, and if so what level of harm would this result in.
- Whether there is sufficient information and detail to ensure the ecology and biodiversity of the site would be preserved and enhanced where possible. Furthermore, would the proposed mitigation be sufficient to safeguard the priority species of skylarks breeding and foraging at the site.
What decided it
The substantial public benefit of renewable energy generation, including the large volume of clean energy produced, was found to clearly and convincingly outweigh the significant landscape harm and less than substantial heritage harm identified.
The significant landscape harm and great-weight less-than-substantial heritage harm were outweighed by the very great benefits of renewable energy generation, together with biodiversity and economic benefits, tipping the balance in favour of allowing the appeal despite conflict with some development plan policies.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 41Core Policy 44Core Policy 39Development Policy 36Development Policy 37Development Policy 38Core Policy 45Core Policy 46
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 187Paragraph 215Paragraph 212Paragraph 168
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Vale of White Horse
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed14 September 20266005809Land to the North of Spring Hill, Kingston Bagpuize With Southmoor, OX13 5HL
- Allowed11 September 20266005108Land West of Little Smiths Farm, Drayton, OX14 4JP
- Dismissed10 July 20266008237Land at Downs Close, Downs Close, Harwell, OX11 0LP
- Allowed10 July 20266004908Land off Paddocks Lane - The Paddocks (Adjoining Godfrey Close), East Hanney, Wantage, OX12 0LX
- Dismissed7 May 2026334886229 Colley Wood, Kennington, Oxford, OX1 5NF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®