Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 April 20253356519

Land at Kitts Green Road/Lea Village Junction, Lea Hall, Birmingham, B33 9SB

Planning appeal 3356519 at Land at Kitts Green Road/Lea Village Junction, Lea Hall, Birmingham, B33 9SB (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 14 April 2025 by Inspector Harding C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting of the proposal upon the safe operation of Birmingham Airport.

17.5m street furniture style monopole mast with 6No. antennas (BS00A05 Grey), 2No. 300mm dishes (BS00A05 Grey), 2No. cabinets (1No. 1900x660x1750mm; 1No. 1050x660x1750mm) (RAL7035 Grey), all ancillary development

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Harding C
Postcode
B33 9SB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting of the proposal upon the safe operation of Birmingham Airport
  • the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of the occupiers of existing properties with particular regard to outlook
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
  • if any harm would occur, whether this would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The need for the installation to be sited as proposed, supported by evidence that 30 alternative sites were adequately considered with justified reasons for dismissal, outweighs the harm to character and appearance of the area.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 122

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

33 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Birmingham City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012986
    Land at the Rear of 79 Church Hill Road, Birmingham, B20 3PA
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266011902
    Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266013662
    22 Wash Lane, Birmingham, B25 8SB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266015503
    60 Mildenhall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham, B42 2PQ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266015146
    9Brittan Close, Birmingham, B34 7NB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.