Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 July 20253356570

The Elms, Hollands Lane, Kelsall, Cheshire west and Chester, CW6 0QT

part change of use from agricultural storage to an indoor padel court with ancillary agriculture plant and machinery store (retrospective)

Authority
Cheshire West and Chester
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Major R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The development constitutes a permitted re-use of a rural building of permanent construction within the Green Belt that preserves openness and does not conflict with Green Belt purposes, and therefore is not inappropriate development requiring very special circumstances.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy STRAT9, Policy STRAT 9, Policy ENV 2, Policy DM3, Policy DM6, Policy DM21

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.