Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 April 20253356932

3 Marcliff Grove, Knutsford, WA16 6JE

a first floor build over side extension, removal of existing canopy and construction of new entrance porch, modification of existing hipped roof to single storey to lean to roof

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Barnes D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, in particular the streetscene

What decided it

The proposed extension would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the streetscene by failing to be subservient to the host property and disrupting the consistency and rhythm of the surrounding 1930s dwellings.

Plan policies cited: CELPS Policy SE 7, SADPD Policy HER 1, SADPD Policy HER 4, KNP Policy HE2, SADPD Policy HER 3, KNP Policy HE3, CELPS Policy SE 1, CELPS Policy SD 2, SADPD Policy HOU 11, KNP Policy D1, KNP Policy H3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.