Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 June 20253357207

Loxwood Garage, Loxwood Road, Alfold Bars, Loxwood, Billingshurst, West Sussex, RH14 0QS

Planning appeal 3357207 at Loxwood Garage, Loxwood Road, Alfold Bars, Loxwood, Billingshurst, West Sussex, RH14 0QS (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 16 June 2025 by Inspector Harley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for a dwelling taking into account local and national strategic planning policies and access to services and facilities.

erection of 5 no. residential dwellings (3 no. terraced and 2 no. semi- detached houses) following demolition of all existing buildings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harley S
Postcode
RH14 0QS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for a dwelling taking into account local and national strategic planning policies and access to services and facilities
  • whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal would not cause an unacceptable loss of employment land
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Grade II Listed Sir Roger Tichborne Public House
  • whether satisfactory living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposed development
  • whether the type of accommodation would meet the housing needs of the District

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the employment site is no longer required for employment uses, combined with the unsustainable location outside the settlement hierarchy and the harmful effect on character and appearance, means the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.

The modest benefits of five family-sized houses, remediation of contaminated land and use of previously developed land were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the unacceptable loss of employment land, the unsustainable location outside the settlement hierarchy with poor access to services, and the harmful effect on character and appearance, when assessed against the Framework policies taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 1Policy 2Policy 26Policy 33Policy 45Policy 47Policy 48Emerging Policy S2Emerging Policy E2Emerging Policy NE2Emerging Policy NE10Emerging Policy H5Emerging Policy P1Emerging Policy P2Emerging Policy P3Emerging Policy P4Emerging Policy P5Emerging Policy P6Emerging Policy P8Emerging Policy P9Emerging Policy P10Policy 2 of the Loxwood Neighbourhood Plan 2013 to 2029Policy 10 of the Loxwood Neighbourhood Plan 2013 to 2029Policy 12 of the Loxwood Neighbourhood Plan 2013 to 2029
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

38 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chichester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 February 20263372880
    Land East Inlands Road and South of Railway Line, Inlands Road, Nutbourne, West Sussex, PO18 8RJ
  2. Allowed7 November 20253358691
    Chichester City Arts Centre, St. Bartholomews Church, Mount Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 3DQ
  3. Dismissed2 October 20243330904
    Land South of 101 First Avenue, Batchmere, Chichester, PO20 7LQ
  4. Notice varied and upheld15 January 20243300531
    Land Northwest of Newbridge Farm, Salthill Road, Fishbourne, West Sussex, PO19 3PY
  5. Dismissed13 March 20233302155
    Goose Cottage, Durbans Road, Wisborough Green, Billingshurst, RH14 0DG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.