Planning appeal decision
Land East Inlands Road and South of Railway Line, Inlands Road, Nutbourne, West Sussex, PO18 8RJ
Planning appeal 3372880 at Land East Inlands Road and South of Railway Line, Inlands Road, Nutbourne, West Sussex, PO18 8RJ (Chichester District Council) was allowed on 27 February 2026 by Inspector Owen A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on highway safety with respect to the increased use of Inlands Road.
Up to 49 dwellings; provision of open space and sustainable drainage
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Owen A
- Postcode
- PO18 8RJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety with respect to the increased use of Inlands Road
- the effect of the proposal on public safety with respect to the increased use of the Inlands Road level crossing
- whether the proposal would prejudice the delivery of wider infrastructure
What decided it
The Inspector concluded that the proposal would not cause unacceptable harm to highway or level-crossing safety and would not prejudice delivery of wider infrastructure under policy A13, so it accorded with the development plan as a whole.
The proposal accorded with the development plan taken as a whole and there were no other material considerations indicating a decision other than in accordance with the plan, so the appeal was allowed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S2Policy H1Policy H2Policy A13Policy NE17Policy T1Policy T2Policy H4Policy NE5Policy NE20Policy P5Policy SB1Policy SB20
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed5 August 20263371769Melita Nursery, Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, PO20 7LW
- Notice varied and upheld3 August 20263372472Littlemead Business Park, Tangmere Road, Tangmere, West Sussex, PO20 2EU
- Dismissed6 July 20266003763Unit 1 The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003762The Old Army Camp, Cemetery Lane, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
- Dismissed6 July 20266003760Land South of Unit 1, Cemetery Lane, Woodmancote, Westbourne Emsworth, PO10 8SB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®