Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld15 December 20253357432

175 Plashet Road, Plaistow, London, E13 0QZ

Without planning permission, the erection of a front extension

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Bale M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether copies of the enforcement notice were properly served as required by section 172 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
  • Whether at the date the notice was issued, enforcement action could be taken in respect of the alleged breach
  • Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control
  • Whether the period specified for compliance is reasonable

What decided it

The compliance period was varied from one month to two months to avoid disruption to the appellant's Christmas trading season while ensuring prompt resolution of the breach, though all other grounds of appeal failed.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.