Planning appeal decision
26 Sawyers Crescent, MAIDENHEAD, SL6 3ND
without planning permission, the erection of a boundary treatment, consisting of one electric metal vehicle entrance gate, one metal pedestrian gate, brick pillars and timber fencing with integral concrete posts
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Robbie G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the means of enclosure constitutes a breach of planning control (ground c)
- Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach (ground f)
- Whether the compliance period is reasonable (ground g)
What decided it
The means of enclosure exceeds 1 metre in height adjacent to a highway used by vehicular traffic and therefore falls outside the permitted development provisions of the GPDO, constituting a breach of planning control that must be remedied by complete removal.
Judgments cited: Tapecrown Ltd v FSS & the Vale of the White Horse DC [2006] EWCA Civ 1744; Garland v MHLG [1968] 20 P&CR 93
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®