Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 May 20253357818

23 Western Avenue, London, NW11 9HE

Planning appeal 3357818 at 23 Western Avenue, London, NW11 9HE (London Borough of Barnet) was dismissed on 7 May 2025 by Inspector Tinsley F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

‘conversion and extension of an existing one-storey outbuilding to create a self-contained dwelling with associated amenity space.’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Tinsley F
Postcode
NW11 9HE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether acceptable living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposed development with regard to privacy and internal living accommodation, including daylight, ventilation, outlook and floorspace

What decided it

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the surrounding area and fail to provide adequate outdoor amenity space with reasonable privacy for future occupiers, contrary to the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy H2 of the London Plan (2021)Policy GSS01 of the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036Policy CDH01 of the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036Policy CDH05 of the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036Policy CDH07 of the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036Policy HOU02 of the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036Policy HOU03 of the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036Policy TRC01 of the Barnet Local Plan 2021-2036

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

820 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barnet

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice varied and upheld29 September 20263359644
    35 Hillview Gardens, London, NW4 2JJ
  2. Allowed10 September 20266000405
    41 Brent Park Road, London, NW4 3HN
  3. Notice upheld28 August 20263361601
    53 Essex Park, London, N3 1ND
  4. Notice varied and upheld27 August 20263361348
    27 Dale Grove, London, N12 8EE
  5. Notice upheld26 August 20263376088
    48 Oldberry Road, Edgware, HA8 9DB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.