Planning appeal decision
Former Sunday School, Townley Street, Macclesfield, SK11 6HZ
Planning appeal 3357938 at Former Sunday School, Townley Street, Macclesfield, SK11 6HZ (Cheshire East) was dismissed on 7 October 2025 by Inspector Veevers A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve the settings of nearby listed buildings, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which they possess; and whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Park Green Conservation Area.
demolition of former Sunday school buildings and the construction of eight, 3-bedroom town houses
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Veevers A
- Postcode
- SK11 6HZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would preserve the settings of nearby listed buildings, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which they possess; and whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Park Green Conservation Area
- Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to daylight, sunlight, outlook and outdoor amenity space
- The effect of the proposed development on flood risk
- The effect of the proposed development on protected species, namely bats; and on nesting birds
What decided it
The harm to the settings of nearby listed buildings and the character and appearance of the conservation area, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupants and failure to satisfy the sequential flood risk test, outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery.
The moderate weight afforded to the public benefits of housing delivery and economic/social benefits was insufficient to outweigh the considerable importance and weight attached to the harm to designated heritage assets and the failure to provide acceptable living conditions; the proposal did not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development due to strong reasons for refusal based on heritage protection policies
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SE1Policy SE3Policy SE7Policy SE13Policy HER3Policy HER4Policy HOU12Policy HOU13Policy ENV2Policy ENV16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 175Paragraph 181Paragraph 207Paragraph 208Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215Paragraph 216
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823; Wheatcroft (Bernard) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1982] JPL 37
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266004692Land Adjoining Jenny Heyes, Heyes Lane, Alderley Edge, SK9 7LH
- Dismissed23 October 2026601496610 Cocksheadhey Road, Bollington, Macclesfield, SK10 5QZ
- Dismissed22 October 20266013754Teal House 4 Shrewbridge Walk, Baddington Lane Baddington Lane, Nantwich, CW5 8AF
- Dismissed20 October 2026601434367 Earle St, Crewe, CW1 2AS
- Dismissed16 October 20266015255Somerford Grange Trap Road, Somerford Booths, Congleton, CW12 2LT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®