Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 June 20253357962

11 Gowan Avenue, London, SW6 6RH

Planning appeal 3357962 at 11 Gowan Avenue, London, SW6 6RH (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 18 June 2025 by Inspector Burch S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed second floor extension on the living conditions of the occupants of No 13 Gowan Avenue, with particular regard to natural light and outlook.

‘Extension at second floor level, over existing first floor rear addition. Mansard roof extension to the front, including raising the ridge by 200mm with associated front dormers and modifications to existing rear mansard.’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Burch S
Postcode
SW6 6RH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed second floor extension on the living conditions of the occupants of No 13 Gowan Avenue, with particular regard to natural light and outlook
  • the effect of the proposed second floor extension on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposed second floor rear extension would cause material harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants through loss of natural light and outlook, particularly to the ground floor bedroom window at No 13 Gowan Avenue, which conflicts with Policies DC4 and HO11 of the Local Plan and the development plan considered as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DC4Policy HO11Policy DC1Key Principle HS7Key Principle HS6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

762 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed27 October 20266010878
    47, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  4. Allowed23 September 20266010549
    The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
  5. Unknown18 September 20263356900
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.