Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 September 20253358076

East House, 13 Fulwood Park, LIVERPOOL, L17 5AD

to retain boundary treatment (with alterations) to provide a 2.17m high boundary wall with 4 no. piers (2.25m high) and sliding electric vehicle gates with separate pedestrian gate, with landscaping (resubmission of planning application ref: 22H/1659)

Authority
Liverpool City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed building, known as Osborne House, or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Fulwood Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the listed building and conservation area, assessed as mid-point less than substantial, was not outweighed by the minimal public benefits of the proposal, and the scheme failed to accord with the statutory presumptions in sections 66(1) and 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

Framework references: 208, 212, 213, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy HD1, Policy UD1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.