Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 September 20253358164

567-569 Fulham Road & 5 Harwood Road, London, SW6 1EX

demolition of rear part of no. 567-569 Fulham Road, and part of the facade fronting Harwood Road elevation, and demolition of the front facade of no. 5 Harwood Road, and erection of a four storey rear and side infill extension including re-building of the facade fronting Harwood Road elevation to create 8 self-contained residential flats in connection with the change of use of the upper floors from Class E to use Class C3

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupants of 565 Fulham Road, with particular regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook
  • whether the proposal would accord with local development plan policies with particular regard to the best use of land, and the provision of affordable housing

What decided it

The proposal would result in unacceptable living conditions for occupants of 565 Fulham Road through significant reductions in daylight and sunlight to a first floor bedroom and substantially poor outlook from rear-facing windows, which harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of providing eight new residential units and making efficient use of a previously developed site.

Framework references: 130, 212, 213, 56, 58

Plan policies cited: Policy DC4, Policy HO11, Key Principle HS7, Policy D3, Policy GG2, Policy H1, Policy H2, Policy H10, Policy HO4, Policy HO5, Policy D6, Policy HO3, Policy H4, Policy HO1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.