Planning appeal decision
567-569 Fulham Road & 5 Harwood Road, London, SW6 1EX
Planning appeal 3358164 at 567-569 Fulham Road & 5 Harwood Road, London, SW6 1EX (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 9 September 2025 by Inspector Veevers A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupants of 565 Fulham Road, with particular regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook.
demolition of rear part of no. 567-569 Fulham Road, and part of the facade fronting Harwood Road elevation, and demolition of the front facade of no. 5 Harwood Road, and erection of a four storey rear and side infill extension including re-building of the facade fronting Harwood Road elevation to create 8 self-contained residential flats in connection with the change of use of the upper floors from Class E to use Class C3
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Veevers A
- Postcode
- SW6 1EX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupants of 565 Fulham Road, with particular regard to daylight, sunlight and outlook
- whether the proposal would accord with local development plan policies with particular regard to the best use of land, and the provision of affordable housing
What decided it
The proposal would result in unacceptable living conditions for occupants of 565 Fulham Road through significant reductions in daylight and sunlight to a first floor bedroom and substantially poor outlook from rear-facing windows, which harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of providing eight new residential units and making efficient use of a previously developed site.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DC4Policy HO11Key Principle HS7Policy D3Policy GG2Policy H1Policy H2Policy H10Policy HO4Policy HO5Policy D6Policy HO3Policy H4Policy HO1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 56Paragraph 58
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 2026601087847, Mendora Road, London, SW6 7ND
- Dismissed1 October 20266010445Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Dismissed1 October 20266010443Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Allowed23 September 20266010549The Triangle, 5 - 17 Hammersmith Grove, London, W6 0LG
- Unknown18 September 20263356900Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®