Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 September 20253358329

Land at Hillrise Crescent, Seaton Village, SR7 0NA

the construction of 37no. dwellings

Authority
Durham County Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The significant harm resulting from the site's unsustainable location and moderate harm to character and appearance, in combination, outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and other material considerations.

the significant harm from unsustainable location and moderate harm to character and appearance outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing provision, and other material considerations

Framework references: 11, 73, 83, 89, 110

Plan policies cited: Policy 6, Policy 21, Policy 29, Policy 15, Policy 10(l), Policy 39

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.