Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld24 March 20253358735

Hawks Mill Meadow, Hawks Mill Street, Needham Market, Suffolk, IP6 8LU

without planning permission, the unauthorised material change of use of the land from agriculture to a mixed use of agriculture and use of the land for the stationing of caravans for residential purposes; and, without planning permission, the unauthorised operational development involving the installation of a cesspit, close boarded fencing and associated entrance gates, and an area of hardstanding

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Hartley D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the period for compliance specified in the enforcement notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed under section 174(2)(g) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990

What decided it

The absence of suitable and available alternative Traveller sites for the occupiers, combined with their status as Romani Gypsies with protected characteristics and health conditions, justified extending the compliance period to nine months to allow them to seek alternative accommodation while maintaining a settled base, despite the significant planning harm caused.

Plan policies cited: Planning Policy for Traveller Sites 2024

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.