Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld18 July 20253358758

38 Elmcroft Crescent, LONDON, NW11 9SY

without planning permission, the construction of a single storey rear extension (as edged in red); the construction of a part first -floor side and part roof and dormer extension (as edged in blue); and the making of a material change of use of the house to use as seven self-contained flats

Authority
London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Howell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether EN2, issued on 4 December 2024 under section 171B(4)(b) of the 1990 Act, was concerned with the same breach of planning control as that alleged in EN1 issued on 17 February 2022.
  • Whether the appellant has taken steps to deliberately conceal the existence of the alleged seven self-contained flats and the unauthorised extensions.
  • Whether or not the relevant enforcement notice was issued after the end of the period of four years beginning with the date on which the alleged operations were substantially completed.
  • Whether the use alleged has been continuous for a period of four years or more without significant interruption beginning with the relevant date of the breach.

What decided it

The appellant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the extensions and three of the seven flats (units 1, 2 and 6) were substantially complete/continuously used more than four years before EN1 was issued, so immunity was not established for those elements.

Judgments cited: Jarmain v SSETR & Welwyn Hatfield DC [2000] EWCA Civ 126; Fidler v FSS & Reigate and Banstead BC [2004] EWCA Civ 1295; Lambrou v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 325 (Admin); Welwyn Hatfield v SSCLG v Beesley [2011] UKSC 15; Jackson v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2015] EWHC 20 Admin

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.