Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20253359085

Chartridge House, 352 Chartridge Lane, Chartridge, Buckinghamshire, HP5 2SH

construction of eleven residential dwellings with associated landscaping following demolition of the existing property

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Philpott M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation
  • whether the proposal should secure the provision of affordable housing
  • the effect of the proposal on the significance of Chartridge House, which is a locally listed building

What decided it

The proposal would adversely affect the integrity of the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC because the unilateral undertaking failed to secure the full mitigation contributions required, and regulation 63(5) of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 has a determinative implication that the scheme could only be approved if it would not adversely affect the integrity of the SAC.

The substantial benefits of housing delivery in a district with severe supply shortage and other benefits from construction, local spending, sustainable construction and biodiversity enhancements outweighed the loss of the locally listed building taken in isolation, but the harm to the integrity of the SAC provided a strong reason for refusal that the material considerations could not overcome.

Framework references: 11, 15, 65, 195, 216

Plan policies cited: CS24, CS8, CS4, CS20, GC1

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE & Another [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.