Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld31 March 20263359302

31 Maryland Square, LONDON, E15 1HF

without planning permission, the erection of a rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Baxter C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the enforcement notice was properly served on the appellant
  • Whether the matters alleged in the notice have occurred as a matter of fact
  • Whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control
  • Whether it was too late for enforcement action to be taken
  • Whether the requirements of the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach

What decided it

The rear extension shown in blue on the enforcement notice plan was not present on the site as of May 2022, constituting unauthorised operational development within the four-year enforcement period, with no evidence of planning permission or permitted development rights.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.