Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 July 20253359344

22 Conway Gardens, Mitcham, CR4 1QA

‘Proposed single storey rear extension measuring 4.5m long, and 3.5m high with eaves height at a maximum 3m’

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Burley P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development is permitted development
  • whether the proposed development would comply with conditions A.3(a), A.4(2)(a)(ii) and A.4(2)(a)(iii) of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)

What decided it

The eaves height of the proposed extension, measured at just over 3.3m, exceeds the 3m maximum threshold required by the GPDO for development within 2m of the curtilage boundary, meaning the proposal is not permitted development.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.